SIXS vs. THNQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while THNQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. SIXS is actively managed, while THNQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXS returned 4.69%/yr vs 15.08%/yr for THNQ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

SIXS vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 36.10% return.

SIXS

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 11.48%
• 1Y: 23.12%
• 3Y*: 13.07%
• 5Y*: 4.69%
• 10Y*: —

THNQ

• 1D: -3.25%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 36.10%
• 6M: 33.52%
• 1Y: 66.41%
• 3Y*: 35.10%
• 5Y*: 15.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXS vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	12.13%	4.59%	5.85%	14.92%	-18.52%	40.74%	44.24%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	36.10%	29.83%	18.82%	56.81%	-39.84%	9.10%	60.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and THNQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXS and THNQ has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIXS vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXS	THNQ
Consumer Cyclical	17.0%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	13.0%	-
Financial Services	12.9%	1.4%
Real Estate	11.7%	0.7%
Healthcare	10.2%	5.2%
Utilities	10.1%	-
Industrials	8.7%	0.8%
Technology	7.6%	74.2%
Basic Materials	4.7%	-
Communication Services	2.3%	10.5%
Energy	1.3%	-

Return for Risk

SIXS vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXS

SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 58
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 59

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 70
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXS vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXS	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	2.34	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.87	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	3.63	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.73	11.47	-1.74

SIXS vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXS	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.68%	-50.56%	+22.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-18.39%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.95%	-29.88%	+9.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.68%	-50.56%	+22.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.60%	+7.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.87%	-15.00%	+6.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	5.81%	-3.43%

Volatility

SIXS vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) is 3.81%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that SIXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXS	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	13.15%	-9.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.12%	23.09%	-13.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.59%	28.49%	-14.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	29.48%	-11.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.62%	28.89%	-9.27%

SIXS vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXS vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than THNQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	1.70%	1.62%	1.09%	1.60%	1.37%	0.94%	0.45%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXS and THNQ in my portfolio?

SIXS and THNQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXS or THNQ?

THNQ has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to SIXS (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, SIXS or THNQ?

On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 15.08% vs 4.69% for SIXS. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SIXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXS or THNQ?

Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 15.08% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXS or THNQ?

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXS or THNQ?

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between SIXS and THNQ?

SIXS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while THNQ is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.