PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXS vs. HTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXS vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -0.55% return.


SIXS

1D
1.61%
1M
4.24%
YTD
12.13%
6M
11.48%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*

HTEC

1D
1.26%
1M
2.81%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
-5.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXS vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
12.13%4.59%5.85%14.92%-18.52%40.74%44.24%
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
-0.55%23.91%2.68%-2.94%-33.72%-0.28%53.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and HTEC is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.60

The correlation between SIXS and HTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXS vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXS
HTEC

Consumer Cyclical

17.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

13.0%

-

Financial Services

12.9%
3.9%

Real Estate

11.7%

-

Healthcare

10.2%
77.3%

Utilities

10.1%

-

Industrials

8.7%
1.3%

Technology

7.6%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Communication Services

2.3%

-

Energy

1.3%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXS
17.0%
HTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

SIXS
13.0%
HTEC

-

Financial Services

SIXS
12.9%
HTEC
3.9%

Real Estate

SIXS
11.7%
HTEC

-

Healthcare

SIXS
10.2%
HTEC
77.3%

Utilities

SIXS
10.1%
HTEC

-

Industrials

SIXS
8.7%
HTEC
1.3%

Technology

SIXS
7.6%
HTEC
3.7%

Basic Materials

SIXS
4.7%
HTEC

-

Communication Services

SIXS
2.3%
HTEC

-

Energy

SIXS
1.3%
HTEC
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXS vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXS
SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

HTEC
HTEC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXS vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXSHTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.77

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

4.22

+5.51

SIXS vs. HTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the HTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and HTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and HTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXSHTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.68%

-57.53%

+29.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-16.31%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-28.67%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-56.10%

+28.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-31.59%

+31.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-29.00%

+20.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

6.81%

-4.43%

Volatility

SIXS vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) is 3.81%, while ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that SIXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXSHTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

6.74%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

15.77%

-6.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

20.92%

-7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

24.50%

-6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

25.46%

-5.84%

SIXS vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXS vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than HTEC's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
0.99%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.00%
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
1.70%1.62%1.09%1.60%1.37%0.94%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXS and HTEC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTEC has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to SIXS (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs HTEC's -57.53%.

On 5-year performance, SIXS leads with 4.69% vs -5.86% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SIXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXS has performed better with a 4.69% return vs -5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.99% for HTEC.

SIXS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.68% for HTEC.

SIXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXS and HTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer