SIXS vs. HTEC
SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. SIXS is actively managed, while HTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXS returned 4.69%/yr vs -5.86%/yr for HTEC. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
SIXS vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -0.55% return.
SIXS
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- 23.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- —
HTEC
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- -5.86%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXS vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 12.13% | 4.59% | 5.85% | 14.92% | -18.52% | 40.74% | 44.24% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -0.55% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 53.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXS and HTEC is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SIXS and HTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
SIXS vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXS
HTEC
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
SIXS
HTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXS
HTEC
-
Financial Services
SIXS
HTEC
Real Estate
SIXS
HTEC
-
Healthcare
SIXS
HTEC
Utilities
SIXS
HTEC
-
Industrials
SIXS
HTEC
Technology
SIXS
HTEC
Basic Materials
SIXS
HTEC
-
Communication Services
SIXS
HTEC
-
Energy
SIXS
HTEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXS vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
SIXS
HTEC
SIXS vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXS | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 1.77 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 4.22 | +5.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXS vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXS | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.68% | -57.53% | +29.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -16.31% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.95% | -28.67% | +8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | -56.10% | +28.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -31.59% | +31.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -29.00% | +20.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 6.81% | -4.43% |
Volatility
SIXS vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) is 3.81%, while ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that SIXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXS | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 6.74% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 15.77% | -6.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 20.92% | -7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 24.50% | -6.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 25.46% | -5.84% |
SIXS vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXS vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than HTEC's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.70% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.94% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXS and HTEC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTEC has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to SIXS (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 5-year performance, SIXS leads with 4.69% vs -5.86% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SIXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXS has performed better with a 4.69% return vs -5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.
SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.99% for HTEC.
SIXS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.68% for HTEC.
SIXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXS and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer