SIXS vs. CSB
SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SIXS is actively managed, while CSB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXS returned 3.28%/yr vs 3.65%/yr for CSB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
SIXS vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than CSB's 8.30% return.
SIXS
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 16.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
SIXS vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 5.36% | 4.59% | 5.85% | 14.92% | -18.52% | 40.74% | 43.41% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.30% | 2.26% | 9.64% | 12.60% | -13.11% | 27.04% | 52.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXS and CSB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SIXS and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SIXS vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXS
CSB
Financial Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SIXS
CSB
Healthcare
SIXS
CSB
Utilities
SIXS
CSB
Consumer Defensive
SIXS
CSB
Real Estate
SIXS
CSB
-
Industrials
SIXS
CSB
Consumer Cyclical
SIXS
CSB
Communication Services
SIXS
CSB
Technology
SIXS
CSB
Energy
SIXS
CSB
Basic Materials
SIXS
CSB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXS vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
SIXS
CSB
SIXS vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXS | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.51 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.90 | 7.26 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXS | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.20 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.45 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
SIXS vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXS | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.68% | -42.07% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -7.18% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.95% | -21.82% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | -24.49% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.19% | -3.12% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -7.14% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.48% | -0.11% |
Volatility
SIXS vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXS | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 3.59% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 9.19% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.30% | 14.54% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 18.78% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 21.31% | -1.65% |
SIXS vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXS vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.26% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.94% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXS and CSB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSB has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to SIXS (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs CSB's -42.07%.
On 5-year performance, CSB leads with 3.65% vs 3.28% for SIXS. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CSB has performed better with a 3.65% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.81% for SIXS.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.35% for CSB.
CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXS and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer