SIXS vs. CEFS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) and CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while CEFS is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXS returned 4.95%/yr vs 13.93%/yr for CEFS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXS charges 1.00%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for CEFS.

Performance

SIXS vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SIXS having a 14.06% return and CEFS slightly lower at 14.00%.

SIXS

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 6.04%
• YTD: 14.06%
• 6M: 12.36%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 4.95%
• 10Y*: —

CEFS

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 14.00%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 24.87%
• 3Y*: 21.68%
• 5Y*: 13.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXS vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	14.06%	4.59%	5.85%	14.92%	-18.52%	40.74%	44.24%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	14.00%	16.67%	23.48%	20.99%	-7.08%	17.86%	26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and CEFS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.47

The correlation between SIXS and CEFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SIXS vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXS

SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 66
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 85
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXS vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXS	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.41	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.47	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.45	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	4.41	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.44	16.90	-6.46

SIXS vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and CEFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXS	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.68%	-38.99%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-5.67%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.95%	-13.37%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.68%	-16.85%	-10.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.24%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.87%	-3.65%	-5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	1.48%	+0.90%

Volatility

SIXS vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXS	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	4.16%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.21%	8.97%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.67%	10.37%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	13.17%	+4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.62%	15.33%	+4.29%

SIXS vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 2.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXS vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than CEFS's 7.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	7.08%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	1.67%	1.62%	1.09%	1.60%	1.37%	0.94%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXS and CEFS in my portfolio?

SIXS and CEFS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXS or CEFS?

CEFS has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to SIXS (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs CEFS's -38.99%.

Which ETF is better, SIXS or CEFS?

On 5-year performance, CEFS leads with 13.93% vs 4.95% for SIXS. On fees, SIXS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXS or CEFS?

Over the 5-year period, CEFS has performed better with a 13.93% return vs 4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXS or CEFS?

SIXS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.61% for CEFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXS or CEFS?

CEFS has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 1.67% for SIXS.

What is the main difference between SIXS and CEFS?

SIXS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CEFS is Event Driven. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 2.61% for CEFS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.