PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXP vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXP vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXP achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.


SIXP

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.99%
YTD
6.59%
6M
7.46%
1Y
17.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXP vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXP and UXJL is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXP vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXP
SIXP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

UXJL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXP vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXPUXJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.92

SIXP vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXPUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

1.87

-0.33

Drawdowns

SIXP vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXP drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXP and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXPUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-10.29%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.76%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-1.51%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

Volatility

SIXP vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXPUXJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28%

13.90%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.00%

13.90%

-4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.00%

13.90%

-4.90%

SIXP vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXP has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXP vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXP nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SIXP and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SIXP is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIXP is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

SIXP and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXP and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXP and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer