SIXP vs. UXJL
SIXP (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXP charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
SIXP vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXP achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
SIXP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 17.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXP vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXP AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF | 6.59% | 6.71% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXP and UXJL is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXP vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
SIXP
UXJL
SIXP vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXP | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXP | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 1.87 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
SIXP vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXP drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXP and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXP | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -10.29% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.76% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -1.51% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility
SIXP vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXP | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.28% | 13.90% | -7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.00% | 13.90% | -4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.00% | 13.90% | -4.90% |
SIXP vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXP has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXP vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXP nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SIXP and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SIXP is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIXP is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
SIXP and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXP and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for SIXP and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer