SIXP vs. AUGT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SIXP (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF) and AUGT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while AUGT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIXP returned 18.30% vs 19.99% for AUGT. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

SIXP vs. AUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXP achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than AUGT's 6.35% return.

SIXP

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 7.66%
• 1Y: 18.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AUGT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 19.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXP vs. AUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIXP AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF	6.70%	13.42%	10.64%
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF	6.35%	14.64%	13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXP and AUGT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2024	0.96

The correlation between SIXP and AUGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXP vs. AUGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXP	AUGT
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SIXP vs. AUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXP

SIXP Risk / Return Rank: 88
SIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

AUGT

AUGT Risk / Return Rank: 82
AUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXP vs. AUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXP	AUGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	2.68	+0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.30	3.83	+0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.54	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	3.77	+0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.90	19.64	+3.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXP vs. AUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXP Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the AUGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXP and AUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXP	AUGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	2.68	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	1.56	-0.01

Drawdowns

SIXP vs. AUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXP drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, smaller than the maximum AUGT drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXP and AUGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXP	AUGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.28%	-13.12%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.48%	-5.36%	+0.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-1.23%	+0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	1.03%	-0.22%

Volatility

SIXP vs. AUGT - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) at 0.78%. This indicates that SIXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXP	AUGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	0.78%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.00%	5.50%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.27%	7.50%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.00%	10.20%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.00%	10.20%	-1.20%

SIXP vs. AUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXP and AUGT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

SIXP vs. AUGT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXP nor AUGT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXP and AUGT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SIXP and AUGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SIXP or AUGT?

SIXP has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to AUGT (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXP dropped -11.28% vs AUGT's -13.12%.

Which ETF is better, SIXP or AUGT?

On 1-year performance, AUGT leads with 19.99% vs 18.30% for SIXP. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXP or AUGT?

Over the 1-year period, AUGT has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 18.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXP or AUGT?

SIXP and AUGT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXP or AUGT?

SIXP and AUGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SIXP and AUGT?

SIXP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AUGT is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.