SIXP vs. PBFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIXP (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF) and PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIXP returned 17.68% vs 12.83% for PBFR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXP charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFR.

Performance

SIXP vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXP achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than PBFR's 4.52% return.

SIXP

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 6.59%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 17.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBFR

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 4.52%
• 6M: 5.34%
• 1Y: 12.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXP vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIXP AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF	6.59%	13.42%	6.35%
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	4.52%	10.44%	5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXP and PBFR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024	0.89

The correlation between SIXP and PBFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXP vs. PBFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXP	PBFR
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SIXP vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXP

SIXP Risk / Return Rank: 88
SIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PBFR

PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 90
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXP vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXP	PBFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	2.99	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.17	4.36	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.66	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	4.57	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.92	24.09	-2.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXP vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXP Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the PBFR Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXP and PBFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXP	PBFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83	2.99	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	1.54	0.00

Drawdowns

SIXP vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXP drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXP and PBFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXP	PBFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.28%	-8.50%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.48%	-2.82%	-1.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.16%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-0.63%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	0.53%	+0.28%

Volatility

SIXP vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) has a higher volatility of 0.80% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 0.64%. This indicates that SIXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXP	PBFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.80%	0.64%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.01%	3.34%	+1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.28%	4.33%	+1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.00%	6.89%	+2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.00%	6.89%	+2.11%

SIXP vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXP has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXP vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

SIXP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%
SIXP AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXP and PBFR in my portfolio?

SIXP and PBFR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXP or PBFR?

SIXP has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to PBFR (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXP dropped -11.28% vs PBFR's -8.50%.

Which ETF is better, SIXP or PBFR?

On 1-year performance, SIXP leads with 17.68% vs 12.83% for PBFR. On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXP or PBFR?

Over the 1-year period, SIXP has performed better with a 17.68% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXP or PBFR?

PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXP or PBFR?

PBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for SIXP.

What is the main difference between SIXP and PBFR?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXP and 0.50% for PBFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.