PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXO vs. NVBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIXO vs. NVBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIXO vs. NVBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SIXO
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF
-2.74%7.19%12.22%17.44%1.51%
NVBT
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF
-2.85%12.84%12.03%16.28%0.24%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SIXO having a -2.74% return and NVBT slightly lower at -2.85%.


SIXO

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.54%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
10Y*

NVBT

1D
2.13%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
-1.06%
1Y
12.04%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIXO vs. NVBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXO and NVBT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

SIXO vs. NVBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXO
SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NVBT
NVBT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NVBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXO vs. NVBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXONVBTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.98

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

1.49

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.43

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.89

7.34

-2.45

SIXO vs. NVBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the NVBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXO and NVBT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXONVBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.98

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.07

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between SIXO and NVBT is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SIXO vs. NVBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXO nor NVBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SIXO vs. NVBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, smaller than the maximum NVBT drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and NVBT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXONVBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-12.90%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-8.84%

+1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

-4.21%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-1.39%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.73%

-0.31%

Volatility

SIXO vs. NVBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) is 1.81%, while Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that SIXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SIXONVBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

3.90%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

6.34%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

12.63%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.21%

10.45%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.21%

10.45%

-1.24%