NVBT vs. SIXJ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NVBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF) and SIXJ (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. NVBT is actively managed, while SIXJ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVBT returned 12.19%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for SIXJ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

NVBT vs. SIXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVBT achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly higher than SIXJ's 6.14% return.

NVBT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 6.95%
• 1Y: 18.19%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIXJ

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 6.45%
• 1Y: 17.77%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVBT vs. SIXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF	7.15%	12.84%	12.03%	16.28%	-0.56%
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	6.14%	12.81%	14.48%	18.07%	-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NVBT and SIXJ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022	0.87

The correlation between NVBT and SIXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVBT vs. SIXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVBT

NVBT Risk / Return Rank: 73
NVBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
NVBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NVBT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
NVBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
NVBT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SIXJ

SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 90
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVBT vs. SIXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVBT	SIXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	3.07	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	4.49	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.66	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	3.94	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.33	21.41	-7.08

NVBT vs. SIXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBT Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the SIXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBT and SIXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVBT vs. SIXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBT drawdown since its inception was -12.90%, smaller than the maximum SIXJ drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBT and SIXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVBT	SIXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.90%	-14.07%	+1.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.21%	-4.53%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.90%	-10.89%	-2.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.00%	-0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.35%	-2.84%	+1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	0.83%	+0.44%

Volatility

NVBT vs. SIXJ - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) at 1.43%. This indicates that NVBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVBT	SIXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	1.43%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.72%	4.77%	+1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.10%	5.82%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.36%	9.98%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.36%	9.98%	+0.38%

NVBT vs. SIXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVBT and SIXJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

NVBT vs. SIXJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVBT nor SIXJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVBT and SIXJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, NVBT and SIXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NVBT or SIXJ?

NVBT has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to SIXJ (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBT dropped -12.90% vs SIXJ's -14.07%.

Which ETF is better, NVBT or SIXJ?

On 3-year performance, SIXJ leads with 13.62% vs 12.19% for NVBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, SIXJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVBT or SIXJ?

Over the 3-year period, SIXJ has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 12.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVBT or SIXJ?

NVBT and SIXJ have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVBT or SIXJ?

NVBT and SIXJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.