PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXO vs. BENJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXO vs. BENJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than BENJ's 1.73% return.


SIXO

1D
0.11%
1M
0.19%
YTD
2.76%
6M
2.38%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
10Y*

BENJ

1D
0.06%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXO vs. BENJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXO and BENJ is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXO vs. BENJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXO
SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BENJ
BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXO vs. BENJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXOBENJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

4.98

-3.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

9.96

-7.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

47.01

-39.38

SIXO vs. BENJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the BENJ Sharpe Ratio of 5.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXO and BENJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXO vs. BENJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, which is greater than BENJ's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and BENJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXOBENJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-0.39%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-0.39%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-0.02%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.08%

+1.01%

Volatility

SIXO vs. BENJ - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) at 0.12%. This indicates that SIXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXOBENJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

0.12%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.05%

0.25%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.19%

0.68%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.03%

0.60%

+8.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.03%

0.60%

+8.43%

SIXO vs. BENJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BENJ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXO vs. BENJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXO nor BENJ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXO and BENJ have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXO has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to BENJ (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXO dropped -12.04% vs BENJ's -0.39%.

On 1-year performance, SIXO leads with 8.28% vs 3.87% for BENJ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SIXO has performed better with a 8.28% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXO.

SIXO and BENJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SIXO is categorized as Options Trading, while BENJ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXO and 0.40% for BENJ.

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.76 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXO and BENJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer