PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXJ vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIXJ vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIXJ vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SIXJ
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
-1.87%12.81%14.48%18.07%-3.68%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.44%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.44% return.


SIXJ

1D
1.64%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-1.87%
6M
0.90%
1Y
12.35%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIXJ vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXJ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SIXJ vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXJ
SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXJ vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXJTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

0.84

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

1.17

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.42

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.73

3.74

+5.99

SIXJ vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXJ and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXJTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

0.84

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

-0.03

+0.73

Correlation

The correlation between SIXJ and TLTW is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SIXJ vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

SIXJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.


TTM2025202420232022
SIXJ
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.66%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Drawdowns

SIXJ vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXJTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.07%

-18.61%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-5.80%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-2.98%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-8.49%

+5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

2.20%

-0.91%

Volatility

SIXJ vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) is 3.17%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that SIXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SIXJTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

3.46%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.58%

5.80%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

8.91%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.17%

11.55%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

11.55%

-1.38%