SIXJ vs. JULT
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT).
SIXJ and JULT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXJ is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2021. JULT is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020.
Performance
SIXJ vs. JULT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIXJ vs. JULT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF | -1.87% | 12.81% | 14.48% | 18.07% | -10.71% |
JULT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF | -2.04% | 13.73% | 17.43% | 21.34% | -6.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly higher than JULT's -2.04% return.
SIXJ
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULT
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 14.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIXJ vs. JULT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SIXJ and JULT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Return for Risk
SIXJ vs. JULT — Risk / Return Rank
SIXJ
JULT
SIXJ vs. JULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXJ | JULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.84 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.76 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 9.67 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXJ | JULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.04 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXJ and JULT is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIXJ vs. JULT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXJ nor JULT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JULT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.86% |
Drawdowns
SIXJ vs. JULT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, roughly equal to the maximum JULT drawdown of -13.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and JULT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXJ | JULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -13.57% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -8.72% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -3.33% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -1.82% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 1.59% | -0.30% |
Volatility
SIXJ vs. JULT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) is 3.17%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that SIXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JULT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIXJ | JULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 3.66% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 5.63% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 12.35% | -2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 10.96% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 10.60% | -0.43% |