SIXJ vs. ISWN
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN).
SIXJ and ISWN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXJ is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2021. ISWN is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the S-Network International BlackSwan. It was launched on Jan 25, 2021. Both SIXJ and ISWN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SIXJ vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIXJ vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF | -1.87% | 12.81% | 14.48% | 18.07% | -10.71% |
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | 0.94% | 23.23% | -3.96% | 8.19% | -24.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 0.94% return.
SIXJ
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISWN
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -6.89%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIXJ vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXJ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIXJ vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank
SIXJ
ISWN
SIXJ vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXJ | ISWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.86 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.61 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 6.68 | +3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXJ | ISWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | -0.04 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXJ and ISWN is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SIXJ vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison
SIXJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | 2.91% | 2.89% | 3.27% | 2.91% | 2.00% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
SIXJ vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and ISWN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXJ | ISWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -32.35% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -9.63% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -7.11% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -16.57% | +13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 2.32% | -1.03% |
Volatility
SIXJ vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) is 3.17%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that SIXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIXJ | ISWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 6.13% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 8.60% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 11.81% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 11.47% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 11.40% | -1.23% |