PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. TAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -8.57% return.


SIXH

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.06%
6M
6.10%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
15.22%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.19%

TAIL

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.17%
6M
-7.56%
YTD
-8.57%
1Y
-11.43%
3Y*
-5.39%
5Y*
-9.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.56M$1.08M$613.75K
$1.10M$1.37M$2.16M

SIXH vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
11.60%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%6.49%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
-8.57%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%-8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and TAIL is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

-0.39

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SIXH and TAIL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.39 to -0.09, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXH vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXHTAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.78

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

-0.88

+4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

-1.85

+10.73

SIXH vs. TAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and TAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and TAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHTAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-52.79%

+41.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-13.10%

+8.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-22.57%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-38.16%

+26.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-52.79%

+50.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-29.51%

+27.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

6.22%

-4.50%

Volatility

SIXH vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 1.84%. This indicates that SIXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHTAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

1.84%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.23%

6.73%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.89%

8.40%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.39%

14.88%

-4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.09%

14.84%

-4.75%

SIXH vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than TAIL's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.83%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.00%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and TAIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXH has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to TAIL (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs TAIL's -52.79%.

On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 9.52% vs -9.21% for TAIL. On fees, TAIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 9.52% return vs -9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.83% for SIXH.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.59% for TAIL.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and TAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer