SIXF vs. ARLU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SIXF (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF) and ARLU (Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIXF returned 15.47% vs 13.82% for ARLU. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

SIXF vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF (SIXF) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXF achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than ARLU's 5.07% return.

SIXF

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 6.90%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 1Y: 15.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.75%

ARLU

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 3.85%
• YTD: 5.07%
• 1Y: 13.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF	$94.85K	$117.50K	$98.35K
SIXF Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF	$106.69K	$66.84K	$166.52K

SIXF vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIXF Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF	8.31%	13.14%	8.52%
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF	5.07%	11.27%	8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXF and ARLU is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.92

The correlation between SIXF and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIXF vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXF

SIXF Risk / Return Rank: 89
SIXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SIXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SIXF Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SIXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SIXF Martin Ratio Rank: 92

ARLU

ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 41
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXF vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF (SIXF) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXF	ARLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.04	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	1.48	+1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.19	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.29	+1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.65	5.36	+10.29

SIXF vs. ARLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the ARLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXF and ARLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXF vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXF drawdown since its inception was -11.25%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXF and ARLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXF	ARLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.25%	-15.38%	+4.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.82%	-9.66%	+4.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.79%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-2.22%	+1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	2.31%	-1.38%

Volatility

SIXF vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF (SIXF) is 2.34%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that SIXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXF	ARLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.34%	3.17%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.41%	9.32%	-3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.47%	11.89%	-5.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.66%	12.55%	-3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.66%	12.55%	-3.89%

SIXF vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXF and ARLU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

SIXF vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXF nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXF and ARLU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SIXF and ARLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SIXF or ARLU?

ARLU has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to SIXF (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXF dropped -11.25% vs ARLU's -15.38%.

Which ETF is better, SIXF or ARLU?

On 1-year performance, SIXF leads with 15.47% vs 13.82% for ARLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, SIXF has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXF or ARLU?

Over the 1-year period, SIXF has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 13.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXF or ARLU?

SIXF and ARLU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXF or ARLU?

SIXF and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.