SIXD vs. XBAP
SIXD (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF) and XBAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXD charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XBAP.
Performance
SIXD vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 7.58% return.
SIXD
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBAP
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXD vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXD AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF | 5.81% | -0.00% |
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April | 7.58% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXD and XBAP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXD vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank
SIXD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XBAP
SIXD vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXD | XBAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 11.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 64.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXD vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum XBAP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and XBAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXD | XBAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -14.57% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.69% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -1.73% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility
SIXD vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXD | XBAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 3.62% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 9.98% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 9.84% | -2.20% |
SIXD vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than XBAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXD vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXD nor XBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXD and XBAP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIXD is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIXD is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBAP.
SIXD and XBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXD and 0.79% for XBAP.
Find the right allocation for SIXD and XBAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer