PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXD vs. OCTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXD vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than OCTW's 4.65% return.


SIXD

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.79%
YTD
6.99%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTW

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.67%
YTD
4.65%
6M
5.17%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXD vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXD and OCTW is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.96

SIXD vs. OCTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXD
OCTW

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SIXD
36.2%
OCTW
36.2%

Financial Services

SIXD
11.9%
OCTW
11.9%

Communication Services

SIXD
10.9%
OCTW
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXD
10.1%
OCTW
10.1%

Healthcare

SIXD
8.4%
OCTW
8.4%

Industrials

SIXD
8.1%
OCTW
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SIXD
4.9%
OCTW
4.9%

Energy

SIXD
3.5%
OCTW
3.5%

Utilities

SIXD
2.3%
OCTW
2.3%

Real Estate

SIXD
1.9%
OCTW
1.9%

Basic Materials

SIXD
1.8%
OCTW
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXD vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXD

OCTW
OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXD vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIXD vs. OCTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXDOCTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.20

1.48

+0.72

Drawdowns

SIXD vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum OCTW drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and OCTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXDOCTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-8.38%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.11%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-0.82%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

Volatility

SIXD vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXDOCTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.36%

4.92%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.36%

6.29%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.36%

6.14%

+1.22%

SIXD vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXD and OCTW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

SIXD vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXD nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SIXD and OCTW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIXD and OCTW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

SIXD and OCTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXD and OCTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer