SIXD vs. FTGC
SIXD (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SIXD charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
SIXD vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 18.86% return.
SIXD
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- 18.86%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
SIXD vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXD AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF | 5.81% | -0.00% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 18.86% | 1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXD and FTGC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXD vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
SIXD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTGC
SIXD vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXD | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXD vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXD | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -59.47% | +54.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -10.87% | +9.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -27.34% | +26.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility
SIXD vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXD | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 15.70% | -8.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 15.87% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 14.71% | -7.07% |
SIXD vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXD vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
SIXD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 16.13% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
SIXD AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXD and FTGC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIXD is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIXD is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 0.00% for SIXD.
SIXD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXD and 0.95% for FTGC.
Find the right allocation for SIXD and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer