PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXD vs. AUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXD vs. AUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than AUGT's 6.35% return.


SIXD

1D
0.06%
1M
2.71%
YTD
7.20%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUGT

1D
0.00%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.35%
6M
7.26%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXD vs. AUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXD and AUGT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.98

SIXD vs. AUGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXD
AUGT

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SIXD
36.2%
AUGT
36.2%

Financial Services

SIXD
11.9%
AUGT
11.9%

Communication Services

SIXD
10.9%
AUGT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXD
10.1%
AUGT
10.1%

Healthcare

SIXD
8.4%
AUGT
8.4%

Industrials

SIXD
8.1%
AUGT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SIXD
4.9%
AUGT
4.9%

Energy

SIXD
3.5%
AUGT
3.5%

Utilities

SIXD
2.3%
AUGT
2.3%

Real Estate

SIXD
1.9%
AUGT
1.9%

Basic Materials

SIXD
1.8%
AUGT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXD vs. AUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXD

AUGT
AUGT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXD vs. AUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIXD vs. AUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXDAUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.29

1.56

+0.73

Drawdowns

SIXD vs. AUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum AUGT drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and AUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXDAUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-13.12%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-1.23%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

Volatility

SIXD vs. AUGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXDAUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.38%

7.50%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

10.20%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.38%

10.20%

-2.82%

SIXD vs. AUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXD and AUGT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

SIXD vs. AUGT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXD nor AUGT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SIXD and AUGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIXD and AUGT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

SIXD and AUGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SIXD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AUGT is Options Trading.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXD and AUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer