PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXA vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIXA vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIXA vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
4.69%15.52%22.70%11.98%-5.72%23.87%4.46%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-5.92%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -5.92% return.


SIXA

1D
1.29%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
4.69%
6M
5.94%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*

QQQM

1D
3.37%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIXA vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SIXA vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXA
SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXA vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXAQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.06

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

1.65

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.89

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.19

6.96

+1.22

SIXA vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXA Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXA and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXAQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.06

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.59

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.63

+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between SIXA and QQQM is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SIXA vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
2.05%2.31%1.62%2.12%2.23%1.63%1.13%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Drawdowns

SIXA vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXAQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-35.04%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-12.55%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-35.04%

+16.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

-8.99%

+4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-8.47%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

3.41%

-1.51%

Volatility

SIXA vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is 3.10%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that SIXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SIXAQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

6.48%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

12.73%

-6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

22.42%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.80%

22.25%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

22.27%

-8.84%