SIXA vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. SIXA is actively managed, while QQQM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXA returned 12.50%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

SIXA vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.

SIXA

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.48%
• 1Y: 18.71%
• 3Y*: 20.65%
• 5Y*: 12.50%
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXA vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	11.89%	15.52%	22.70%	11.98%	-5.72%	23.87%	4.46%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXA and QQQM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXA and QQQM has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIXA vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXA	QQQM
Consumer Defensive	23.8%	7.7%
Technology	19.7%	53.8%
Communication Services	13.4%	15.8%
Healthcare	12.7%	4.2%
Financial Services	9.6%	0.2%
Industrials	7.8%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	12.3%
Utilities	5.0%	1.4%
Energy	3.1%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

SIXA vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXA

SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 65
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXA vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXA	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.65	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.46	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.45	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	3.53	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.75	13.52	-0.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXA vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXA Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXA and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXA	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	2.65	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	0.82	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.85	+0.35

Drawdowns

SIXA vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXA	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.38%	-35.04%	+16.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.59%	-11.96%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.22%	-22.70%	+11.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.38%	-35.04%	+16.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-0.20%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-8.25%	+5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	3.11%	-1.64%

Volatility

SIXA vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is 2.56%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that SIXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXA	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	4.48%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.76%	12.05%	-5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.94%	15.91%	-6.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.80%	22.24%	-9.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.36%	22.12%	-8.76%

SIXA vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXA vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	2.01%	2.31%	1.62%	2.12%	2.23%	1.63%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXA and QQQM in my portfolio?

SIXA and QQQM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXA or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to SIXA (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, SIXA or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 12.50% for SIXA. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXA or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXA or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXA or QQQM?

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between SIXA and QQQM?

SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.