PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXA vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXA vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 12.44% return.


SIXA

1D
0.32%
1M
0.88%
6M
8.31%
YTD
14.36%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.02%

HTUS

1D
1.43%
1M
1.78%
6M
11.01%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
12.61%
ALL TIME*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$513.88K$512.72K$620.13K
$1.52M$1.58M$834.78K

SIXA vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
14.36%15.52%22.70%11.98%-5.72%23.87%19.04%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
12.44%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%24.29%39.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXA and HTUS is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.65

The correlation between SIXA and HTUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXA vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXA
SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXA vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXAHTUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.82

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

13.42

-0.03

SIXA vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXA Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXA and HTUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXA vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and HTUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXAHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-47.50%

+29.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-8.68%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-24.41%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-24.41%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

0.00%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-4.02%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.82%

-0.35%

Volatility

SIXA vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is 2.69%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that SIXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXAHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

3.34%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

10.33%

-3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.02%

12.28%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

19.11%

-6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.26%

21.52%

-8.26%

SIXA vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXA vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than HTUS's 10.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.58%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
1.98%2.31%1.62%2.12%2.23%1.63%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXA and HTUS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTUS has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to SIXA (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs HTUS's -47.50%.

On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 14.95% vs 12.46% for SIXA. On fees, SIXA is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIXA is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HTUS.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.58%, compared with 1.98% for SIXA.

SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HTUS is Equity Hedged. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.96% for HTUS.

SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXA and HTUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer