PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXA vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXA vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SIXA having a 11.89% return and HTUS slightly lower at 11.33%.


SIXA

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.40%
YTD
11.89%
6M
12.48%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*

HTUS

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.04%
YTD
11.33%
6M
12.04%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXA vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
11.89%15.52%22.70%11.98%-5.72%23.87%18.45%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
11.33%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%24.29%37.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXA and HTUS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.66

The correlation between SIXA and HTUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIXA vs. HTUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXA
HTUS

Consumer Defensive

23.8%
4.9%

Technology

19.7%
35.6%

Communication Services

13.4%
11.2%

Healthcare

12.7%
8.5%

Financial Services

9.6%
11.8%

Industrials

7.8%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
10.1%

Utilities

5.0%
2.4%

Energy

3.1%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

SIXA
23.8%
HTUS
4.9%

Technology

SIXA
19.7%
HTUS
35.6%

Communication Services

SIXA
13.4%
HTUS
11.2%

Healthcare

SIXA
12.7%
HTUS
8.5%

Financial Services

SIXA
9.6%
HTUS
11.8%

Industrials

SIXA
7.8%
HTUS
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXA
6.7%
HTUS
10.1%

Utilities

SIXA
5.0%
HTUS
2.4%

Energy

SIXA
3.1%
HTUS
3.5%

Real Estate

SIXA
1.4%
HTUS
1.9%

Basic Materials

SIXA

-

HTUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXA vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXA
SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXA vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXAHTUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.35

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

17.27

-4.52

SIXA vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXA Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXA and HTUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXAHTUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.53

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.81

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.58

+0.63

Drawdowns

SIXA vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and HTUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXAHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-47.50%

+29.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-8.68%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-24.41%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-24.41%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.55%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-4.06%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.68%

-0.21%

Volatility

SIXA vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXAHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

2.47%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

9.39%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

11.50%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.80%

19.03%

-6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.36%

21.45%

-8.09%

SIXA vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXA vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than HTUS's 10.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.68%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
2.01%2.31%1.62%2.12%2.23%1.63%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXA and HTUS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXA has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to HTUS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs HTUS's -47.50%.

On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 15.35% vs 12.50% for SIXA. On fees, SIXA is cheaper at 0.86% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIXA is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 2.01% for SIXA.

SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXA and HTUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer