PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIVR vs. XPPT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SIVR is traded in USD, while XPPT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XPPT.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -16.88% return, which is significantly higher than XPPT.DE's -29.18% return.


SIVR

1D
1.59%
1M
-21.69%
YTD
-16.88%
6M
-22.35%
1Y
63.38%
3Y*
37.03%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
11.29%

XPPT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-17.77%
YTD
-29.18%
6M
-29.18%
1Y
17.88%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-16.88%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%69.88%
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-29.18%142.09%-8.88%-6.06%9.79%-9.67%23.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and XPPT.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.52

The correlation between SIVR and XPPT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

XPPT.DE
XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIVRXPPT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.40

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

0.86

+1.91

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and XPPT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than XPPT.DE's maximum drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and XPPT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIVRXPPT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.85%

-44.47%

-31.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.92%

-44.47%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.92%

-44.47%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.92%

-44.47%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.29%

-44.47%

-4.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.83%

-20.48%

-27.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.98%

20.79%

+2.19%

Volatility

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) at 11.03%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPPT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIVRXPPT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.69%

11.03%

+4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.87%

40.37%

+18.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.71%

50.99%

+9.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.77%

33.36%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.16%

33.77%

-1.61%

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XPPT.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIVR vs. XPPT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIVR nor XPPT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SIVR and XPPT.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for XPPT.DE.

SIVR is categorized as Silver, while XPPT.DE is Precious Metals. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while XPPT.DE tracks Platinum. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.38% for XPPT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIVR and XPPT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer