SIVR vs. REGB.L
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while REGB.L is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIVR returned 37.03%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for REGB.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REGB.L.
Performance
SIVR vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SIVR is traded in USD, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -16.88% return, which is significantly lower than REGB.L's 14.96% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -21.69%
- YTD
- -16.88%
- 6M
- -22.35%
- 1Y
- 63.38%
- 3Y*
- 37.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
REGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -16.30%
- YTD
- 14.96%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 110.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -16.88% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | 2.94% |
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 14.96% | 88.93% | -35.64% | -18.71% | -31.13% | -21.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and REGB.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
REGB.L
SIVR vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | REGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 4.94 | -3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 11.91 | -9.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, roughly equal to the maximum REGB.L drawdown of -75.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and REGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | REGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -75.84% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.92% | -22.52% | -28.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.92% | -61.39% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.29% | -38.25% | -11.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -48.37% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.98% | 9.32% | +13.66% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) at 13.79%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | REGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.69% | 13.79% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.87% | 34.41% | +24.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.71% | 47.23% | +13.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.77% | 48.30% | -11.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 48.30% | -16.14% |
SIVR vs. REGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than REGB.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and REGB.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REGB.L.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while REGB.L is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.59% for REGB.L.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and REGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer