SIVR vs. PLTR
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SIVR returned 19.07%/yr vs 39.00%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIVR vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -11.18%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 86.32%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -6.85%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -4.75% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 9.28% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and PLTR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
PLTR
SIVR vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.03 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.14 | +2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | -0.25 | +4.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -84.62% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.33% | -38.22% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.33% | -40.61% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | -79.14% | +33.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.89% | -38.22% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -40.27% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | 21.23% | -0.38% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) have volatilities of 16.37% and 17.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.37% | 17.16% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.11% | 38.32% | +20.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.76% | 50.83% | +8.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 65.44% | -28.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 69.75% | -37.72% |
Dividends
SIVR vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and PLTR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to SIVR (16.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer