SIVR vs. GLMD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD).

SIVR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009.

Performance

SIVR vs. GLMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIVR vs. GLMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF	5.81%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	-8.96%	5.97%
GLMD Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.	-29.38%	-76.47%	-41.58%	-93.93%	-72.53%	-41.48%	-46.19%	-15.37%	-25.36%	160.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly higher than GLMD's -29.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed GLMD with an annualized return of 17.10%, while GLMD has yielded a comparatively lower -52.51% annualized return.

SIVR

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -16.47%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 6M: 58.90%
• 1Y: 123.03%
• 3Y*: 45.76%
• 5Y*: 24.34%
• 10Y*: 17.10%

GLMD

• 1D: 8.16%
• 1M: -14.17%
• YTD: -29.38%
• 6M: -65.81%
• 1Y: -62.68%
• 3Y*: -80.96%
• 5Y*: -75.65%
• 10Y*: -52.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SIVR vs. GLMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 86
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

GLMD

GLMD Risk / Return Rank: 12
GLMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
GLMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
GLMD Omega Ratio Rank: 13
GLMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
GLMD Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. GLMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIVR	GLMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	-0.74	+2.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	-0.99	+3.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.89	+0.52
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	-0.79	+3.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.74	-1.34	+10.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIVR vs. GLMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the GLMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and GLMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIVR	GLMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	-0.74	+2.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	-0.46	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	-0.38	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	-0.39	+0.72

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and GLMD is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SIVR vs. GLMD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIVR nor GLMD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. GLMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum GLMD drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and GLMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIVR	GLMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.85%	-99.99%	+24.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.42%	-79.62%	+37.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.42%	-99.93%	+57.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.42%	-99.99%	+57.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.45%	-99.98%	+64.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.99%	-73.98%	+25.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.75%	47.20%	-33.45%

Volatility

SIVR vs. GLMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 16.98%, while Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) has a volatility of 24.05%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIVR	GLMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.98%	24.05%	-7.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.26%	58.87%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.02%	84.98%	-27.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.30%	165.57%	-130.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.39%	137.94%	-106.55%