SIVR vs. ENVB
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while ENVB (Enveric Biosciences Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 14.57%/yr vs -74.86%/yr for ENVB. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIVR vs. ENVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly higher than ENVB's -59.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed ENVB with an annualized return of 14.57%, while ENVB has yielded a comparatively lower -74.86% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 92.86%
- 3Y*
- 42.25%
- 5Y*
- 20.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
ENVB
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- -34.22%
- YTD
- -59.23%
- 6M
- -72.39%
- 1Y
- -89.81%
- 3Y*
- -87.52%
- 5Y*
- -85.10%
- 10Y*
- -74.86%
SIVR vs. ENVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -1.40% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
ENVB Enveric Biosciences Inc | -59.23% | -94.37% | -72.43% | -37.50% | -95.53% | -37.16% | -34.51% | -48.17% | -94.37% | -52.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and ENVB is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. ENVB — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
ENVB
SIVR vs. ENVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | ENVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.87 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | -0.98 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | -1.34 | +5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. ENVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum ENVB drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and ENVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | ENVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -100.00% | +24.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.33% | -91.49% | +46.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.33% | -99.81% | +54.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | -100.00% | +54.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.33% | -100.00% | +54.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.85% | -100.00% | +60.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -86.07% | +38.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.00% | 66.73% | -45.73% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. ENVB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 16.52%, while Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) has a volatility of 21.07%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | ENVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 21.07% | -4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.14% | 105.59% | -46.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.96% | 175.01% | -115.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.53% | 155.96% | -119.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.05% | 164.65% | -132.60% |
Dividends
SIVR vs. ENVB - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor ENVB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and ENVB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENVB has higher volatility (21.07%) compared to SIVR (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs ENVB's -100.00%.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and ENVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer