SIVR vs. COPJ

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while COPJ is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIVR returned 37.03%/yr vs 38.25%/yr for COPJ. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for COPJ.

Performance

SIVR vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -16.88% return, which is significantly lower than COPJ's 0.79% return.

SIVR

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -21.69%
• YTD: -16.88%
• 6M: -22.35%
• 1Y: 63.38%
• 3Y*: 37.03%
• 5Y*: 17.50%
• 10Y*: 11.29%

COPJ

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: -11.17%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: -0.15%
• 1Y: 82.49%
• 3Y*: 38.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	-16.88%	145.34%	21.08%	-1.26%
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	0.79%	140.63%	11.07%	-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and COPJ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.57

The correlation between SIVR and COPJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIVR vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 30
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 23

COPJ

COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 57
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIVR	COPJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.84	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	2.24	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	2.57	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.77	6.71	-3.95

SIVR vs. COPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the COPJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and COPJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than COPJ's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and COPJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIVR	COPJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.85%	-32.28%	-43.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.92%	-32.28%	-18.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.92%	-32.28%	-18.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.29%	-22.96%	-26.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.83%	-12.08%	-35.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.98%	12.33%	+10.65%

Volatility

SIVR vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 15.69%, while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a volatility of 18.91%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIVR	COPJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.69%	18.91%	-3.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.87%	38.69%	+20.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.71%	44.95%	+15.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.77%	35.66%	+1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.16%	35.66%	-3.50%

SIVR vs. COPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than COPJ's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIVR vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	11.48%	11.57%	11.64%	2.48%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIVR and COPJ in my portfolio?

SIVR and COPJ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIVR or COPJ?

COPJ has higher volatility (18.91%) compared to SIVR (15.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs COPJ's -32.28%.

Which ETF is better, SIVR or COPJ?

On 3-year performance, COPJ leads with 38.25% vs 37.03% for SIVR. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SIVR has been the lower-risk option at 15.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIVR or COPJ?

Over the 3-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 38.25% return vs 37.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIVR or COPJ?

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIVR or COPJ?

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 11.48%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

What is the main difference between SIVR and COPJ?

SIVR is categorized as Silver, while COPJ is Copper. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.78% for COPJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.