SIVR vs. BRLN
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and BRLN (BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while BRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by BlackRock. SIVR is passively managed, while BRLN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIVR returned 45.38%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for BRLN. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BRLN.
Performance
SIVR vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than BRLN's 1.35% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 24.90%
- 1Y
- 110.95%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
BRLN
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 2.85% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 15.71% |
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 1.35% | 5.38% | 7.49% | 13.42% | 2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and BRLN is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.01 |
The correlation between SIVR and BRLN shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
BRLN
SIVR vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIVR | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.56 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 9.95 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIVR | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.68 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 2.19 | -1.87 |
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and BRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -3.85% | -72.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.42% | -2.00% | -40.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.42% | -3.85% | -38.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.25% | -0.21% | -37.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.85% | -0.31% | -47.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.64% | 0.51% | +19.13% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.28% compared to BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) at 0.81%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.28% | 0.81% | +15.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.30% | 2.24% | +56.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.84% | 3.06% | +55.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.17% | 3.73% | +32.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 3.73% | +28.14% |
SIVR vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 6.35% | 6.50% | 7.87% | 9.06% | 1.48% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and BRLN have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to BRLN (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs BRLN's -3.85%.
On 3-year performance, SIVR leads with 45.38% vs 7.36% for BRLN. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 45.38% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.
BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while BRLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.55% for BRLN.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and BRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer