SIVR vs. BRK-B
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 14.22%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIVR vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 14.22%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 13.22% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -11.18%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 86.32%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- 1Y
- 0.35%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
SIVR vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -4.75% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -2.67% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 2.37% | 10.93% | 3.01% | 21.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and BRK-B is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009 | 0.09 |
The correlation between SIVR and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
BRK-B
SIVR vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.01 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.02 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | -0.05 | +4.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -53.86% | -21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.33% | -9.42% | -35.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.33% | -14.95% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | -26.58% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.33% | -29.57% | -15.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.89% | -9.36% | -32.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -11.07% | -36.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | 4.53% | +16.32% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.95%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.37% | 3.95% | +12.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.11% | 10.78% | +48.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.76% | 14.38% | +45.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 17.12% | +19.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 19.44% | +12.59% |
Dividends
SIVR vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to BRK-B (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer