PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SITM vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SITM vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SiTime Corporation (SITM) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SITM achieves a 51.53% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return.


SITM

1D
1.39%
1M
-23.96%
6M
47.39%
YTD
51.53%
1Y
163.84%
3Y*
58.81%
5Y*
31.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
74.26%

MU

1D
-5.90%
1M
-20.26%
6M
98.49%
YTD
188.53%
1Y
655.32%
3Y*
127.41%
5Y*
61.18%
10Y*
51.33%
ALL TIME*
17.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.28B$42.78B$49.13B
$238.88M$264.90M$400.80M

SITM vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SITM
SiTime Corporation
51.53%64.63%75.73%20.13%-65.26%161.36%338.94%96.15%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
188.53%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SITM and MU is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019

0.52

The correlation between SITM and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SITM:

$14.13B

MU:

$929.52B

EPS

SITM:

-$0.92

MU:

$44.42

PS Ratio

SITM:

37.22

MU:

10.36

PB Ratio

SITM:

12.16

MU:

9.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

SITM:

$379.91M

MU:

$90.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SITM:

$211.60M

MU:

$65.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

SITM:

-$13.71M

MU:

$44.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SITM vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SITM
SITM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SITM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SITM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SITM vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SiTime Corporation (SITM) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SITMMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.63

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

16.92

-13.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

64.08

-53.94

SITM vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SITM Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SITM and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SITM vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SITM drawdown since its inception was -78.12%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITM and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SITMMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.12%

-98.25%

+20.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.73%

-39.10%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.26%

-57.63%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.12%

-57.63%

-20.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.63%

-32.17%

-8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.64%

-58.02%

+21.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.24%

10.31%

+5.93%

Volatility

SITM vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SiTime Corporation (SITM) is 27.75%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that SITM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SITMMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.75%

31.11%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.42%

67.64%

-5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.71%

81.13%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.22%

56.32%

+20.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.69%

51.42%

+29.27%

Dividends

SITM vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

SITM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.06%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
SITM
SiTime Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SITM vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SiTime Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SITM vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SiTime Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SITM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 66.96M and revenue of 113.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

SITM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of -12.34M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

SITM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of -5.22M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SITM and MU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to SITM (27.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITM dropped -78.12% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SITM and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer