SITM vs. MPWR
SITM (SiTime Corporation) and MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, SITM returned 43.34%/yr vs 36.56%/yr for MPWR. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SITM vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SITM achieves a 88.08% return, which is significantly higher than MPWR's 72.37% return.
SITM
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- YTD
- 88.08%
- 6M
- 83.53%
- 1Y
- 222.72%
- 3Y*
- 81.68%
- 5Y*
- 43.34%
- 10Y*
- —
MPWR
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 72.37%
- 6M
- 59.11%
- 1Y
- 128.65%
- 3Y*
- 47.03%
- 5Y*
- 36.56%
- 10Y*
- 37.72%
SITM vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SITM SiTime Corporation | 88.08% | 64.63% | 75.73% | 20.13% | -65.26% | 161.36% | 338.94% | 96.15% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 72.37% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SITM and MPWR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SITM and MPWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SITM:
$17.50B
MPWR:
$76.78B
SITM:
-$0.94
MPWR:
$13.89
SITM:
45.11
MPWR:
25.63
SITM:
15.10
MPWR:
20.88
SITM:
$379.91M
MPWR:
$2.96B
SITM:
$211.60M
MPWR:
$1.63B
SITM:
-$13.71M
MPWR:
$861.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SITM vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank
SITM
MPWR
SITM vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SiTime Corporation (SITM) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SITM | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.33 | 5.76 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.94 | 15.40 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SITM | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 2.70 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.69 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.58 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
SITM vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SITM drawdown since its inception was -78.12%, which is greater than MPWR's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITM and MPWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SITM | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.12% | -72.27% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.59% | -22.45% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.26% | -51.65% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.12% | -51.65% | -26.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.31% | -7.73% | -18.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.81% | -17.72% | -19.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.47% | 8.38% | +4.09% |
Volatility
SITM vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison
SiTime Corporation (SITM) has a higher volatility of 22.72% compared to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) at 19.38%. This indicates that SITM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SITM | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.72% | 19.38% | +3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.94% | 36.53% | +19.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.55% | 47.99% | +28.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 53.40% | +22.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.56% | 47.17% | +33.39% |
Dividends
SITM vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison
SITM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.43% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
SITM SiTime Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SITM vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SiTime Corporation and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SITM vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison
SITM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 66.96M and revenue of 113.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
SITM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of -12.34M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
SITM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of -5.22M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SITM and MPWR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SITM has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to MPWR (19.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITM dropped -78.12% vs MPWR's -72.27%.
SITM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SITM and MPWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer