SIO vs. ABI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SIO (Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF) and ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past year, SIO returned 5.27% vs 5.25% for ABI. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

SIO vs. ABI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF (SIO) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIO achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than ABI's 3.08% return.

SIO

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: -0.11%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: 6.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 2.61%
• YTD: 3.08%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIO vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIO Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF	0.65%	4.35%
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	3.08%	2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SIO and ABI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

SIO vs. ABI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIO

SIO Risk / Return Rank: 45
SIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SIO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

ABI

ABI Risk / Return Rank: 96
ABI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ABI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIO vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF (SIO) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIO	ABI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	4.13	-2.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	6.28	-4.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	2.01	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	5.55	-3.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.91	16.81	-10.90

SIO vs. ABI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the ABI Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIO and ABI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIO vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIO drawdown since its inception was -6.94%, which is greater than ABI's maximum drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIO and ABI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIO	ABI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-0.95%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.62%	-0.95%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-0.05%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-0.17%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	0.31%	+0.58%

Volatility

SIO vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF (SIO) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) at 0.35%. This indicates that SIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIO	ABI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	0.35%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	0.81%	+1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.36%	1.28%	+3.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.96%	1.26%	+3.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	1.26%	+3.70%

SIO vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIO and ABI have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

SIO vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison

SIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than ABI's 6.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	6.21%	3.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIO Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF	7.01%	6.80%	5.30%	5.37%	3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIO and ABI in my portfolio?

SIO and ABI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIO or ABI?

SIO has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to ABI (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIO dropped -6.94% vs ABI's -0.95%.

Which ETF is better, SIO or ABI?

On 1-year performance, SIO leads with 5.27% vs 5.25% for ABI. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, ABI has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIO or ABI?

Over the 1-year period, SIO has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIO or ABI?

SIO and ABI have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIO or ABI?

SIO has the higher dividend yield at 7.01%, compared with 6.21% for ABI.

What is the main difference between SIO and ABI?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and VictoryShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.