SIMS vs. FWD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD).

SIMS and FWD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIMS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017. FWD is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Mar 21, 2023.

Performance

SIMS vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIMS vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF	0.39%	23.75%	-0.27%	6.60%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	3.97%	32.00%	29.23%	25.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 3.97% return.

SIMS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: -6.56%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: -0.54%
• 1Y: 36.91%
• 3Y*: 7.72%
• 5Y*: -0.69%
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: 5.03%
• 1M: -7.40%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 7.40%
• 1Y: 54.36%
• 3Y*: 28.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMS vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

FWD

AB Disruptors ETF

SIMS

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF

Return for Risk

SIMS vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMS

SIMS Risk / Return Rank: 72
SIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 91
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMS vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIMS	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.89	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.51	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	3.94	-1.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	13.30	-7.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIMS vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMS and FWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIMS	FWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.89	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	1.24	-1.04

Correlation

The correlation between SIMS and FWD is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SIMS vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than FWD's 0.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF	0.65%	0.66%	0.88%	1.49%	1.48%	0.97%	0.58%	1.24%	0.85%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.11%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SIMS vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, which is greater than FWD's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIMS	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.97%	-29.02%	-14.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.79%	-13.50%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.64%	-8.65%	-2.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.33%	-4.23%	-12.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.14%	4.00%	+2.14%

Volatility

SIMS vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) is 7.30%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that SIMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIMS	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.30%	11.26%	-3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.68%	19.48%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.54%	28.86%	-1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	24.63%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.17%	24.63%	+1.54%