SIMS vs. ACWV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SIMS (SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SIMS tracks the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIMS returned 0.79%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for ACWV. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIMS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

SIMS vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 3.83% return.

SIMS

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -2.46%
• 6M: 1.53%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 1Y: 23.32%
• 3Y*: 7.94%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: —

ACWV

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 2.66%
• YTD: 3.83%
• 1Y: 6.41%
• 3Y*: 9.88%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 7.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMS vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF	7.39%	23.75%	-0.27%	7.43%	-27.13%	9.00%	29.88%	35.30%	-18.07%	0.03%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	3.83%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SIMS and ACWV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between SIMS and ACWV has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIMS vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIMS	ACWV
Industrials	48.6%	8.1%
Technology	24.6%	25.8%
Energy	10.7%	3.7%
Communication Services	5.9%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	5.1%
Utilities	3.5%	7.3%
Basic Materials	3.1%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.8%
Financial Services	-	13.2%
Healthcare	-	13.0%
Real Estate	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

SIMS vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMS

SIMS Risk / Return Rank: 33
SIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
SIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 26
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 25
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMS vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIMS	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.80	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.18	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.15	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.01	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.80	2.89	+0.90

SIMS vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMS and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIMS vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIMS	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.97%	-28.82%	-15.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.79%	-6.37%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.78%	-7.56%	-21.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.97%	-18.14%	-25.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.71%	-1.52%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-3.11%	-12.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.16%	2.22%	+3.94%

Volatility

SIMS vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 3.17%. This indicates that SIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIMS	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	3.17%	+4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.23%	6.23%	+9.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.34%	8.07%	+16.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.32%	10.27%	+15.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.03%	12.29%	+13.74%

SIMS vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIMS vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ACWV's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.93%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF	0.56%	0.66%	0.88%	1.49%	1.48%	0.97%	0.58%	1.24%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIMS and ACWV in my portfolio?

SIMS and ACWV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIMS or ACWV?

SIMS has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to ACWV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMS dropped -43.97% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, SIMS or ACWV?

On 5-year performance, ACWV leads with 5.49% vs 0.79% for SIMS. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIMS or ACWV?

Over the 5-year period, ACWV has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIMS or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SIMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIMS or ACWV?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.56% for SIMS.

What is the main difference between SIMS and ACWV?

SIMS tracks S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SIMS and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.