PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILJ vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILJ vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -12.94% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


SILJ

1D
-3.45%
1M
-9.88%
6M
-24.25%
YTD
-12.94%
1Y
68.80%
3Y*
38.59%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
3.95%
ALL TIME*
2.50%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M
$79.44M$79.47M$126.28M

SILJ vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
-12.94%183.89%5.13%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and SBIT is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILJ vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SILJ vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SILJSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.35

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

5.19

-1.74

SILJ vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILJSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.04%

-91.35%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.12%

-47.94%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.22%

-77.87%

+37.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.36%

-69.07%

+27.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.08%

21.67%

-1.59%

Volatility

SILJ vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is 14.89%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that SILJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILJSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.89%

18.09%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.55%

67.10%

-19.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.44%

88.65%

-30.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.12%

96.10%

-50.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.34%

96.10%

-49.76%

SILJ vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILJ vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
2.30%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


SILJ and SBIT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to SILJ (14.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 68.80% for SILJ. On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, SILJ has been the lower-risk option at 14.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 68.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 2.30% for SILJ.

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILJ and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer