PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILJ vs. EWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILJ vs. EWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 103.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 8.82%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.84% annualized return.


SILJ

1D
3.23%
1M
-17.41%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
0.26%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
45.21%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
8.82%

EWY

1D
-0.75%
1M
10.39%
YTD
103.10%
6M
117.85%
1Y
203.95%
3Y*
46.46%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
16.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
-1.77%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
103.10%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and EWY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012

0.30

The correlation between SILJ and EWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SILJ vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SILJ
EWY

Basic Materials

99.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

0.3%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
1.8%

Communication Services

0.0%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Energy

-

0.7%

Healthcare

-

3.1%

Industrials

-

14.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

57.4%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Basic Materials

SILJ
99.8%
EWY
2.5%

Financial Services

SILJ
0.3%
EWY
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

SILJ
0.2%
EWY
1.8%

Communication Services

SILJ
0.0%
EWY
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SILJ

-

EWY
6.3%

Energy

SILJ

-

EWY
0.7%

Healthcare

SILJ

-

EWY
3.1%

Industrials

SILJ

-

EWY
14.5%

Real Estate

SILJ

-

EWY

-

Technology

SILJ

-

EWY
57.4%

Utilities

SILJ

-

EWY
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILJ vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SILJEWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.59

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

8.65

-6.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

30.24

-24.58

SILJ vs. EWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the EWY Sharpe Ratio of 4.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and EWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than EWY's maximum drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and EWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILJEWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.04%

-74.14%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.16%

-23.08%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.16%

-27.36%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.55%

-48.55%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-49.73%

-20.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.56%

-8.88%

-23.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.40%

-20.11%

-21.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.17%

6.59%

+8.58%

Volatility

SILJ vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is 20.76%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that SILJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILJEWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.76%

25.64%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.36%

42.65%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.54%

46.51%

+10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.76%

30.15%

+14.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.41%

28.06%

+18.35%

SILJ vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILJ vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than EWY's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.03%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
2.04%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


SILJ and EWY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to SILJ (20.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs EWY's -74.14%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 8.82% for SILJ. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SILJ has been the lower-risk option at 20.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.59% for EWY.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILJ and EWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer