SILJ vs. EWY
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 8.82%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for EWY. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
SILJ vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 103.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 8.82%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.84% annualized return.
SILJ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 45.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 203.95%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
SILJ vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -1.77% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and EWY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | 0.30 |
The correlation between SILJ and EWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SILJ vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SILJ
EWY
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SILJ
EWY
Financial Services
SILJ
EWY
Consumer Defensive
SILJ
EWY
Communication Services
SILJ
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
SILJ
-
EWY
Energy
SILJ
-
EWY
Healthcare
SILJ
-
EWY
Industrials
SILJ
-
EWY
Real Estate
SILJ
-
EWY
-
Technology
SILJ
-
EWY
Utilities
SILJ
-
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
EWY
SILJ vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SILJ | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.59 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 8.65 | -6.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 30.24 | -24.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than EWY's maximum drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -74.14% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.16% | -23.08% | -16.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.16% | -27.36% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.55% | -48.55% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -49.73% | -20.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -8.88% | -23.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.40% | -20.11% | -21.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.17% | 6.59% | +8.58% |
Volatility
SILJ vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is 20.76%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that SILJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.76% | 25.64% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.36% | 42.65% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.54% | 46.51% | +10.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 30.15% | +14.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.41% | 28.06% | +18.35% |
SILJ vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than EWY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.04% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILJ and EWY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to SILJ (20.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 8.82% for SILJ. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SILJ has been the lower-risk option at 20.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
SILJ is categorized as Silver, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.59% for EWY.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer