SIL vs. SPMO
SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIL returned 9.80%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
SIL vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 9.80%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.
SIL
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -10.83%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 69.43%
- 3Y*
- 46.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
SIL vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -2.20% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and SPMO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SIL and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIL vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIL
SPMO
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SIL
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
SIL
SPMO
Communication Services
SIL
-
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
SIL
-
SPMO
Energy
SIL
-
SPMO
Financial Services
SIL
-
SPMO
Healthcare
SIL
-
SPMO
Industrials
SIL
-
SPMO
Real Estate
SIL
-
SPMO
Technology
SIL
-
SPMO
Utilities
SIL
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIL vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SIL
SPMO
SIL vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 3.44 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 13.01 | -7.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIL vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.99% | -30.95% | -52.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.08% | -12.70% | -24.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.08% | -20.13% | -16.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.77% | -22.74% | -30.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.04% | -30.95% | -32.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.80% | -1.68% | -29.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.40% | -4.60% | -46.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.90% | 3.35% | +10.55% |
Volatility
SIL vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.29%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.29% | 10.29% | +9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.57% | 16.73% | +26.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.69% | 19.48% | +32.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.64% | 19.65% | +19.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.81% | 20.48% | +19.33% |
SIL vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIL vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.21% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIL and SPMO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 9.80% for SIL. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
SIL is categorized as Silver, while SPMO is Momentum. SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SIL and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIL and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer