PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIL vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIL vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 9.80%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.


SIL

1D
3.27%
1M
-10.83%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
0.10%
1Y
69.43%
3Y*
46.50%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
9.80%

SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
6.27%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
44.90%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIL vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
-2.20%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and SPMO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.24

The correlation between SIL and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIL vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIL
SPMO

Basic Materials

99.8%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
4.1%

Communication Services

-

8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.2%

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

-

5.9%

Healthcare

-

6.4%

Industrials

-

11.1%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

54.9%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Basic Materials

SIL
99.8%
SPMO
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

SIL
0.2%
SPMO
4.1%

Communication Services

SIL

-

SPMO
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SIL

-

SPMO
1.2%

Energy

SIL

-

SPMO
3.1%

Financial Services

SIL

-

SPMO
5.9%

Healthcare

SIL

-

SPMO
6.4%

Industrials

SIL

-

SPMO
11.1%

Real Estate

SIL

-

SPMO
1.0%

Technology

SIL

-

SPMO
54.9%

Utilities

SIL

-

SPMO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIL vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIL vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SILSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.44

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

13.01

-7.91

SIL vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIL vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.99%

-30.95%

-52.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.08%

-12.70%

-24.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.08%

-20.13%

-16.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.77%

-22.74%

-30.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

-30.95%

-32.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.80%

-1.68%

-29.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.40%

-4.60%

-46.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.90%

3.35%

+10.55%

Volatility

SIL vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.29%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.29%

10.29%

+9.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.57%

16.73%

+26.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.69%

19.48%

+32.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.64%

19.65%

+19.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.81%

20.48%

+19.33%

SIL vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIL vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.21%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIL and SPMO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIL has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 9.80% for SIL. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.

SIL is categorized as Silver, while SPMO is Momentum. SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SIL and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIL and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer