SIL vs. COLO

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) and COLO (Global X MSCI Colombia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while COLO is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIL returned 10.15%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for COLO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for COLO.

Performance

SIL vs. COLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than COLO's 24.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has outperformed COLO with an annualized return of 10.15%, while COLO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.13% annualized return.

SIL

• 1D: 6.45%
• 1M: -5.08%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 6M: 6.87%
• 1Y: 80.36%
• 3Y*: 49.62%
• 5Y*: 14.79%
• 10Y*: 10.15%

COLO

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 23.53%
• YTD: 24.92%
• 6M: 24.58%
• 1Y: 63.49%
• 3Y*: 35.46%
• 5Y*: 17.04%
• 10Y*: 7.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIL vs. COLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	4.11%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	34.78%	-22.42%	1.67%
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	24.92%	68.88%	4.68%	24.92%	-21.32%	-11.50%	-14.60%	30.42%	-19.88%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and COLO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010	0.35

SIL vs. COLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIL	COLO
Basic Materials	99.8%	18.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.6%
Energy	-	17.1%
Financial Services	-	39.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	17.5%

Return for Risk

SIL vs. COLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 45
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 40

COLO

COLO Risk / Return Rank: 79
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIL vs. COLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIL	COLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.77	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	3.68	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.48	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	3.59	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.76	9.71	-3.95

SIL vs. COLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the COLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and COLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIL vs. COLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than COLO's maximum drawdown of -78.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and COLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIL	COLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.99%	-78.91%	-4.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.08%	-17.79%	-19.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.08%	-18.35%	-18.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.47%	-43.86%	-6.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.04%	-62.75%	-0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.33%	-15.20%	-11.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.40%	-40.28%	-11.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.00%	6.56%	+7.44%

Volatility

SIL vs. COLO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 20.44% compared to Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) at 11.44%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIL	COLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.44%	11.44%	+9.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.80%	20.36%	+23.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.15%	23.09%	+29.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.75%	23.37%	+16.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.84%	25.47%	+14.37%

SIL vs. COLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than COLO's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIL vs. COLO - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than COLO's 6.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	6.01%	7.51%	6.08%	6.99%	12.55%	2.32%	3.23%	3.04%	3.03%	1.83%	1.48%	1.58%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.14%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIL and COLO in my portfolio?

SIL and COLO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIL or COLO?

SIL has higher volatility (20.44%) compared to COLO (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs COLO's -78.91%.

Which ETF is better, SIL or COLO?

On 10-year performance, SIL leads with 10.15% vs 7.13% for COLO. On fees, COLO is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, COLO has been the lower-risk option at 11.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIL or COLO?

Over the 10-year period, SIL has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIL or COLO?

COLO is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIL or COLO?

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.01%, compared with 1.14% for SIL.

What is the main difference between SIL and COLO?

SIL is categorized as Silver, while COLO is Latin America Equities. SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SIL and 0.62% for COLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.