PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIL vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIL vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIL vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
7.85%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
-8.31%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -8.31% return.


SIL

1D
7.82%
1M
-23.68%
YTD
7.85%
6M
27.11%
1Y
131.18%
3Y*
45.13%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
14.65%

BOTZ

1D
3.84%
1M
-14.86%
YTD
-8.31%
6M
-5.83%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIL vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SIL vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIL vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SILBOTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

0.63

+2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

1.11

+1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.14

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

0.80

+3.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.73

2.94

+10.80

SIL vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and BOTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SILBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

0.63

+2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

-0.01

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.36

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and BOTZ is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SIL vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than BOTZ's 0.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.10%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.71%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%0.00%

Drawdowns

SIL vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and BOTZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SILBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.99%

-55.54%

-27.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.91%

-19.34%

-13.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

-55.54%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.68%

-16.24%

-7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.79%

-18.56%

-33.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.53%

5.29%

+4.24%

Volatility

SIL vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.45% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 8.91%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SILBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.45%

8.91%

+10.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.52%

17.65%

+24.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.72%

27.77%

+21.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.63%

26.53%

+12.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.74%

25.68%

+14.06%