SIL vs. ^XAU
SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while ^XAU (PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, SIL returned 8.64%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for ^XAU. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
SIL vs. ^XAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -5.97% return, which is significantly lower than ^XAU's -4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has underperformed ^XAU with an annualized return of 8.64%, while ^XAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.
SIL
- 1D
- -5.47%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- YTD
- -5.97%
- 6M
- -10.24%
- 1Y
- 65.33%
- 3Y*
- 47.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
^XAU
- 1D
- -4.66%
- 1M
- -7.62%
- YTD
- -4.52%
- 6M
- -9.34%
- 1Y
- 57.28%
- 3Y*
- 40.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
SIL vs. ^XAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -5.97% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
^XAU PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index | -4.52% | 149.51% | 9.14% | 4.00% | -8.75% | -8.14% | 34.86% | 51.32% | -17.13% | 8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and ^XAU is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SIL and ^XAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIL vs. ^XAU — Risk / Return Rank
SIL
^XAU
SIL vs. ^XAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIL | ^XAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.70 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 4.36 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIL vs. ^XAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, roughly equal to the maximum ^XAU drawdown of -83.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and ^XAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIL | ^XAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.99% | -83.04% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.08% | -33.81% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.08% | -33.81% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.48% | -45.52% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.04% | -45.52% | -17.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.47% | -30.52% | -2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.37% | -39.74% | -11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.58% | 13.18% | +1.40% |
Volatility
SIL vs. ^XAU - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.47% compared to PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU) at 16.76%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^XAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIL | ^XAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.47% | 16.76% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.45% | 38.78% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.59% | 46.66% | +5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.84% | 36.58% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.90% | 36.48% | +3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SIL and ^XAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SIL has higher volatility (19.47%) compared to ^XAU (16.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs ^XAU's -83.04%.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIL and ^XAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer