PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIL vs. ^XAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIL vs. ^XAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -11.58% return, which is significantly lower than ^XAU's -10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has underperformed ^XAU with an annualized return of 5.01%, while ^XAU has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.


SIL

1D
-3.20%
1M
-8.04%
6M
-21.68%
YTD
-11.58%
1Y
56.89%
3Y*
42.08%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
5.01%
ALL TIME*
4.29%

^XAU

1D
-3.16%
1M
-6.25%
6M
-19.47%
YTD
-10.05%
1Y
49.10%
3Y*
35.94%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
10.56%
ALL TIME*
2.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$67.23M$68.26M$119.44M

SIL vs. ^XAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
-11.58%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%
^XAU
PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index
-10.05%149.51%9.14%4.00%-8.75%-8.14%34.86%51.32%-17.13%8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and ^XAU is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.93

The correlation between SIL and ^XAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIL vs. ^XAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

^XAU
^XAU Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
^XAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XAU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
^XAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XAU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIL vs. ^XAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIL^XAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

2.97

+0.13

SIL vs. ^XAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the ^XAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and ^XAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIL vs. ^XAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, roughly equal to the maximum ^XAU drawdown of -83.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and ^XAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIL^XAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.99%

-83.04%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.41%

-37.41%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.41%

-37.41%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.91%

-45.52%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

-45.52%

-17.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.43%

-34.54%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.27%

-39.73%

-11.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.68%

17.14%

+1.54%

Volatility

SIL vs. ^XAU - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU) at 12.44%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^XAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIL^XAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

12.44%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.94%

38.76%

+5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.41%

47.46%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.12%

36.87%

+3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.80%

36.45%

+3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SIL and ^XAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SIL has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to ^XAU (12.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs ^XAU's -83.04%.

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIL and ^XAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer