MUX vs. CCO
MUX (McEwen Mining Inc.) and CCO (Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. MUX operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while CCO operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, MUX returned -6.07%/yr vs -6.90%/yr for CCO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MUX vs. CCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUX achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than CCO's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MUX has outperformed CCO with an annualized return of -6.07%, while CCO has yielded a comparatively lower -6.90% annualized return.
MUX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -9.79%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 110.72%
- 3Y*
- 39.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- -6.07%
CCO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 115.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.80%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -6.90%
MUX vs. CCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. | 3.03% | 137.92% | 7.91% | 23.04% | -33.90% | -10.00% | -22.44% | -30.01% | -19.78% | -21.37% |
CCO Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. | 9.05% | 61.31% | -24.73% | 73.33% | -68.28% | 100.61% | -42.31% | -44.89% | 14.80% | 10.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUX and CCO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2005 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
MUX:
$1.26
CCO:
-$0.55
MUX:
6.93
CCO:
0.55
MUX:
$161.86M
CCO:
$1.64B
MUX:
$53.23M
CCO:
$645.84M
MUX:
$52.58M
CCO:
$258.11M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUX vs. CCO — Risk / Return Rank
MUX
CCO
MUX vs. CCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUX | CCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 6.30 | -3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 21.25 | -14.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUX vs. CCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUX drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, which is greater than CCO's maximum drawdown of -94.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUX and CCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUX | CCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.67% | -94.19% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.48% | -18.40% | -22.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.49% | -57.07% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.47% | -78.80% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.89% | -93.12% | -0.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.66% | -67.44% | -26.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.48% | -53.99% | -32.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.43% | 5.44% | +11.99% |
Volatility
MUX vs. CCO - Volatility Comparison
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) has a higher volatility of 21.38% compared to Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) at 1.41%. This indicates that MUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUX | CCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.38% | 1.41% | +19.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.06% | 21.38% | +29.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.43% | 47.89% | +20.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.42% | 65.81% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.89% | 69.67% | -5.78% |
Dividends
MUX vs. CCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither MUX nor CCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 19.94% | 41.51% | 0.00% |
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 0.55% | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.47% |
Financials
MUX vs. CCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McEwen Mining Inc. and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MUX and CCO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUX has higher volatility (21.38%) compared to CCO (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUX dropped -99.67% vs CCO's -94.19%.
CCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUX and CCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer