PortfoliosLab logo
MUX vs. CCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MUX and CCO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MUX vs. CCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MUX:

-0.68

CCO:

-0.48

Sortino Ratio

MUX:

-0.64

CCO:

-0.49

Omega Ratio

MUX:

0.93

CCO:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

MUX:

-0.33

CCO:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

MUX:

-1.09

CCO:

-1.04

Ulcer Index

MUX:

29.28%

CCO:

24.65%

Daily Std Dev

MUX:

53.15%

CCO:

52.59%

Max Drawdown

MUX:

-99.67%

CCO:

-94.60%

Current Drawdown

MUX:

-97.69%

CCO:

-85.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MUX:

$384.93M

CCO:

$586.12M

EPS

MUX:

-$0.57

CCO:

-$0.23

PEG Ratio

MUX:

0.00

CCO:

16.86

PS Ratio

MUX:

2.28

CCO:

0.39

PB Ratio

MUX:

0.80

CCO:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

MUX:

$168.95M

CCO:

$1.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MUX:

$29.86M

CCO:

$715.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

MUX:

$17.48M

CCO:

$492.45M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUX achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly higher than CCO's -15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MUX has outperformed CCO with an annualized return of -3.09%, while CCO has yielded a comparatively lower -15.08% annualized return.


MUX

YTD

-6.43%

1M

-9.90%

6M

-15.25%

1Y

-35.75%

3Y*

13.12%

5Y*

-3.10%

10Y*

-3.09%

CCO

YTD

-15.33%

1M

20.83%

6M

-24.68%

1Y

-25.16%

3Y*

-11.96%

5Y*

4.64%

10Y*

-15.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


McEwen Mining Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MUX vs. CCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUX is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUX is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUX is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUX is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCO is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCO is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCO is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCO is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCO is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCO is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MUX vs. CCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MUX Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the CCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUX and CCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MUX vs. CCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither MUX nor CCO has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%0.55%0.44%0.34%0.47%0.00%
CCO
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.59%19.94%41.51%0.00%4.59%

Drawdowns

MUX vs. CCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUX drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, which is greater than CCO's maximum drawdown of -94.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUX and CCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MUX vs. CCO - Volatility Comparison

McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) has a higher volatility of 13.98% compared to Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) at 11.85%. This indicates that MUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MUX vs. CCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McEwen Mining Inc. and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
35.70M
334.18M
(MUX) Total Revenue
(CCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MUX vs. CCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between McEwen Mining Inc. and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
28.2%
49.6%
(MUX) Gross Margin
(CCO) Gross Margin
MUX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McEwen Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.07M and revenue of 35.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

CCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 165.65M and revenue of 334.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.

MUX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McEwen Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 6.70M and revenue of 35.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

CCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.79M and revenue of 334.18M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.7%.

MUX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McEwen Mining Inc. reported a net income of -7.35M and revenue of 35.70M, resulting in a net margin of -20.6%.

CCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 62.51M and revenue of 334.18M, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.