PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUX vs. NAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MUX vs. NAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUX achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than NAK's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MUX has underperformed NAK with an annualized return of -6.07%, while NAK has yielded a comparatively higher 21.11% annualized return.


MUX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-9.79%
YTD
3.03%
6M
-2.95%
1Y
110.72%
3Y*
39.33%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
-6.07%

NAK

1D
-2.86%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
3.55%
6M
-12.07%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
110.57%
5Y*
32.37%
10Y*
21.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUX vs. NAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
3.03%137.92%7.91%23.04%-33.90%-10.00%-22.44%-30.01%-19.78%-21.37%
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
3.55%238.78%79.86%46.42%-32.31%1.30%-25.12%-24.46%-67.84%-14.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MUX and NAK is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2003

0.30

The correlation between MUX and NAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (10 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MUX:

$1.38B

NAK:

$1.12B

EPS

MUX:

$1.26

NAK:

-CA$0.19

PB Ratio

MUX:

2.12

NAK:

89.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

MUX:

$161.86M

NAK:

CA$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

MUX:

$53.23M

NAK:

-CA$85.85K

EBITDA (TTM)

MUX:

$52.58M

NAK:

-CA$99.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUX vs. NAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUX
MUX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NAK
NAK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAK Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUX vs. NAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUXNAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

0.79

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

1.35

+5.03

MUX vs. NAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the NAK Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUX and NAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUX vs. NAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUX drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, roughly equal to the maximum NAK drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUX and NAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUXNAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.67%

-99.01%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.48%

-67.68%

+27.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.49%

-67.68%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.47%

-67.68%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.89%

-93.79%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.66%

-90.32%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.48%

-73.94%

-12.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.43%

39.73%

-22.30%

Volatility

MUX vs. NAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) is 21.38%, while Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) has a volatility of 25.20%. This indicates that MUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUXNAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.38%

25.20%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.06%

77.34%

-26.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.43%

115.41%

-46.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.42%

83.94%

-20.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.89%

97.98%

-34.09%

Dividends

MUX vs. NAK - Dividend Comparison

Neither MUX nor NAK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%0.55%0.44%0.34%0.47%
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MUX vs. NAK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McEwen Mining Inc. and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M2022202320242025202600
(MUX) Total Revenue
(NAK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MUX values in USD, NAK values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


MUX and NAK have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAK has higher volatility (25.20%) compared to MUX (21.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUX dropped -99.67% vs NAK's -99.01%.

MUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUX and NAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer