MUX vs. NAK
Compare and contrast key facts about McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK).
Performance
MUX vs. NAK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MUX vs. NAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. | 10.32% | 137.92% | 7.91% | 23.04% | -33.90% | -10.00% | -22.44% | -30.01% | -19.78% | -21.37% |
NAK Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. | -28.93% | 238.78% | 79.86% | 46.42% | -32.31% | 1.30% | -25.12% | -24.46% | -67.84% | -14.49% |
Fundamentals
MUX:
$1.12B
NAK:
$770.03M
MUX:
$0.19
NAK:
-$0.15
MUX:
2.05
NAK:
12.75
MUX:
$132.93M
NAK:
$0.00
MUX:
$22.45M
NAK:
-$85.85K
MUX:
$21.78M
NAK:
-$78.62M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUX achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly higher than NAK's -28.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MUX has underperformed NAK with an annualized return of 0.64%, while NAK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.
MUX
- 1D
- 8.27%
- 1M
- -27.97%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 170.46%
- 3Y*
- 34.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 0.64%
NAK
- 1D
- 10.24%
- 1M
- -9.68%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 21.74%
- 3Y*
- 80.31%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUX vs. NAK — Risk / Return Rank
MUX
NAK
MUX vs. NAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUX | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 0.18 | +2.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 1.13 | +1.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.16 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | 0.37 | +4.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | 0.66 | +11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUX | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 0.18 | +2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.20 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | 0.15 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.03 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between MUX and NAK is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MUX vs. NAK - Dividend Comparison
Neither MUX nor NAK has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 0.55% | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.47% |
NAK Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MUX vs. NAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUX drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, roughly equal to the maximum NAK drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUX and NAK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUX | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.67% | -99.01% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.28% | -67.68% | +31.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.48% | -68.85% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.89% | -93.79% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.21% | -93.36% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.46% | -73.78% | -12.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.14% | 38.08% | -24.94% |
Volatility
MUX vs. NAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) is 21.23%, while Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) has a volatility of 25.14%. This indicates that MUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MUX | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.23% | 25.14% | -3.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.53% | 85.88% | -35.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.32% | 119.51% | -54.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.07% | 83.25% | -20.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.01% | 98.15% | -34.14% |
Financials
MUX vs. NAK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McEwen Mining Inc. and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities