PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SII.TO vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SII.TO vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Inc (SII.TO) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SII.TO is traded in CAD, while NEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SII.TO achieves a 24.09% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SII.TO has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 22.78%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.78% annualized return.


SII.TO

1D
2.64%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
24.09%
6M
29.21%
1Y
95.63%
3Y*
58.72%
5Y*
28.49%
10Y*
22.78%

NEM

1D
2.89%
1M
-11.95%
YTD
2.86%
6M
4.04%
1Y
79.79%
3Y*
38.17%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SII.TO vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SII.TO
Sprott Inc
24.09%126.73%38.44%2.73%-18.97%57.52%25.86%16.40%5.75%-2.27%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
2.86%160.36%-0.03%-10.93%-15.75%7.35%36.96%25.14%1.74%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SII.TO and NEM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2008

0.30

Over the past year, SII.TO and NEM have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

SII.TO:

CA$4.14

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

SII.TO:

40.09

NEM:

15.82

PEG Ratio

SII.TO:

0.82

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

SII.TO:

8.98

NEM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

SII.TO:

CA$476.63M

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SII.TO:

CA$369.54M

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

SII.TO:

CA$151.96M

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SII.TO vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SII.TO
SII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SII.TO vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Inc (SII.TO) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SII.TONEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.11

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

8.30

+0.47

SII.TO vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SII.TO and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SII.TO vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SII.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SII.TO and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SII.TONEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.85%

-70.02%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.05%

-27.50%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.05%

-33.96%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.38%

-59.76%

+16.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.06%

-59.76%

+11.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.34%

-21.57%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.79%

-29.16%

-21.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.91%

10.30%

+0.61%

Volatility

SII.TO vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Inc (SII.TO) is 12.70%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 15.86%. This indicates that SII.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SII.TONEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.70%

15.86%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.96%

37.54%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.64%

47.43%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.85%

38.16%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.11%

36.11%

+1.00%

Dividends

SII.TO vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

SII.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than NEM's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
SII.TO
Sprott Inc
1.25%1.36%2.38%3.04%2.89%1.75%1.67%0.40%0.47%0.49%0.48%0.50%

Financials

SII.TO vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Inc and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
199.39M
0
(SII.TO) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SII.TO values in CAD, NEM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


SII.TO and NEM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SII.TO and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer