SIDNX vs. ASIA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SIDNX (Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund) and ASIA (Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF) are both funds - SIDNX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Hartford, while ASIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. Over the past year, SIDNX returned 36.64% vs 51.76% for ASIA. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIDNX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ASIA.

Performance

SIDNX vs. ASIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund (SIDNX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIDNX achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly lower than ASIA's 25.54% return.

SIDNX

• 1D: -3.25%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 13.93%
• 6M: 17.55%
• 1Y: 36.64%
• 3Y*: 23.29%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

ASIA

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 25.54%
• 6M: 29.02%
• 1Y: 51.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIDNX vs. ASIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SIDNX Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund	13.93%	45.41%	5.93%	5.48%
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	25.54%	32.06%	3.41%	0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SIDNX and ASIA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.74

The correlation between SIDNX and ASIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIDNX vs. ASIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIDNX

SIDNX Risk / Return Rank: 79
SIDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SIDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SIDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SIDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SIDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ASIA

ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 78
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIDNX vs. ASIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund (SIDNX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIDNX	ASIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.26	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	2.77	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.43	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	3.59	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.99	13.05	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIDNX vs. ASIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIDNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the ASIA Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIDNX and ASIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIDNX	ASIA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.26	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	1.07	-0.69

Drawdowns

SIDNX vs. ASIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIDNX drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than ASIA's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIDNX and ASIA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIDNX	ASIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.41%	-23.95%	-38.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.95%	-14.47%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	-7.20%	+3.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.14%	-4.86%	-6.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	3.98%	-1.13%

Volatility

SIDNX vs. ASIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund (SIDNX) is 5.31%, while Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a volatility of 12.32%. This indicates that SIDNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIDNX	ASIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	12.32%	-7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.12%	20.43%	-8.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.21%	23.04%	-8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.63%	20.76%	-6.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	20.76%	-5.16%

SIDNX vs. ASIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIDNX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than ASIA's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIDNX vs. ASIA - Dividend Comparison

SIDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than ASIA's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	0.83%	1.05%	0.58%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIDNX Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund	5.83%	6.65%	2.06%	2.92%	4.14%	2.67%	2.24%	3.29%	5.86%	3.31%	1.30%	3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIDNX and ASIA in my portfolio?

SIDNX and ASIA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIDNX or ASIA?

ASIA has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to SIDNX (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIDNX dropped -62.41% vs ASIA's -23.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.