SICNX vs. TRIGX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SICNX (Schwab International Core Equity Fund) and TRIGX (T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SICNX returned 9.43%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for TRIGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SICNX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TRIGX.

Performance

SICNX vs. TRIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than TRIGX's 9.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SICNX has underperformed TRIGX with an annualized return of 9.43%, while TRIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.34% annualized return.

SICNX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 19.88%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 9.43%

TRIGX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 9.97%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: 27.72%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 13.03%
• 10Y*: 10.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SICNX vs. TRIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund	9.01%	31.57%	9.04%	20.00%	-15.31%	11.01%	4.64%	19.16%	-18.30%	25.48%
TRIGX T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund	9.97%	43.90%	7.85%	19.18%	-8.45%	12.77%	1.63%	20.89%	-18.22%	18.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SICNX and TRIGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2008	0.95

The correlation between SICNX and TRIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SICNX vs. TRIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SICNX

SICNX Risk / Return Rank: 25
SICNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
SICNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SICNX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SICNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SICNX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

TRIGX

TRIGX Risk / Return Rank: 50
TRIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
TRIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
TRIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TRIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
TRIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SICNX vs. TRIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SICNX	TRIGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.80	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	2.54	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	2.27	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.54	8.05	-2.50

SICNX vs. TRIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SICNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the TRIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SICNX and TRIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SICNX vs. TRIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum TRIGX drawdown of -62.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and TRIGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SICNX	TRIGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.78%	-62.28%	+6.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-12.16%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.53%	-14.25%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.11%	-27.37%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.62%	-41.94%	+1.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-2.50%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.17%	-12.63%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	3.42%	+0.09%

Volatility

SICNX vs. TRIGX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX) at 4.80%. This indicates that SICNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SICNX	TRIGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	4.80%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.77%	13.11%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.35%	15.38%	+1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	15.97%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.31%	16.79%	-0.48%

SICNX vs. TRIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SICNX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than TRIGX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SICNX vs. TRIGX - Dividend Comparison

SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.61%	2.67%	3.42%	2.86%	1.03%	3.56%	2.86%	2.61%	2.50%	2.04%
TRIGX T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund	2.53%	2.78%	2.58%	2.66%	2.98%	2.49%	1.34%	2.82%	2.49%	0.26%	2.65%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SICNX and TRIGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, SICNX and TRIGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SICNX or TRIGX?

SICNX has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to TRIGX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SICNX dropped -55.78% vs TRIGX's -62.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.