SICNX vs. SCINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX).
SICNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2008. SCINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jun 17, 1953.
Performance
SICNX vs. SCINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SICNX vs. SCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 1.58% | 31.57% | 9.04% | 20.00% | -15.31% | 11.01% | 4.64% | 19.16% | -18.30% | 25.48% |
SCINX DWS CROCI International Fund | 3.60% | 44.99% | 2.37% | 18.85% | -13.29% | 9.30% | 3.00% | 21.45% | -14.47% | 22.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than SCINX's 3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SICNX has underperformed SCINX with an annualized return of 8.35%, while SCINX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.21% annualized return.
SICNX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
SCINX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SICNX vs. SCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SICNX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than SCINX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SICNX vs. SCINX — Risk / Return Rank
SICNX
SCINX
SICNX vs. SCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SICNX | SCINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 2.07 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 2.67 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 2.42 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 9.04 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SICNX | SCINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.07 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.67 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.33 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SICNX and SCINX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SICNX vs. SCINX - Dividend Comparison
SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.42% | 2.86% | 1.03% | 3.56% | 2.86% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 2.04% |
SCINX DWS CROCI International Fund | 2.65% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 3.55% | 3.48% | 3.89% | 1.80% | 3.39% | 3.73% | 2.49% | 3.76% | 3.52% |
Drawdowns
SICNX vs. SCINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum SCINX drawdown of -63.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and SCINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SICNX | SCINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -63.90% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -12.28% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.11% | -30.06% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.62% | -35.59% | -5.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.28% | -8.77% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -16.95% | +4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 3.28% | 0.00% |
Volatility
SICNX vs. SCINX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) at 6.06%. This indicates that SICNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SICNX | SCINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 6.06% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 10.12% | +3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 15.76% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 15.74% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 16.06% | +0.34% |