SICNX vs. FIGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX).
SICNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2008. FIGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 3, 2009.
Performance
SICNX vs. FIGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SICNX vs. FIGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 1.58% | 31.57% | 9.04% | 20.00% | -15.31% | 11.01% | 4.64% | 19.16% | -18.30% | 25.48% |
FIGSX Fidelity Series International Growth Fund | -1.99% | 19.12% | 5.93% | 21.74% | -22.87% | 16.61% | 18.52% | 35.59% | -10.97% | 30.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than FIGSX's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SICNX has underperformed FIGSX with an annualized return of 8.35%, while FIGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.60% annualized return.
SICNX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
FIGSX
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- 13.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SICNX vs. FIGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SICNX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FIGSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SICNX vs. FIGSX — Risk / Return Rank
SICNX
FIGSX
SICNX vs. FIGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SICNX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 0.74 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.16 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 0.98 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 3.83 | +2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SICNX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.74 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.33 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.48 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between SICNX and FIGSX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SICNX vs. FIGSX - Dividend Comparison
SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.42% | 2.86% | 1.03% | 3.56% | 2.86% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 2.04% |
FIGSX Fidelity Series International Growth Fund | 8.85% | 8.67% | 4.29% | 1.27% | 3.53% | 8.33% | 16.24% | 3.64% | 7.47% | 3.14% | 2.54% | 3.54% |
Drawdowns
SICNX vs. FIGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than FIGSX's maximum drawdown of -34.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and FIGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SICNX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -34.47% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -13.89% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.11% | -34.47% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.62% | -34.47% | -6.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.28% | -10.60% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -6.49% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 3.55% | -0.27% |
Volatility
SICNX vs. FIGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) is 7.99%, while Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that SICNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SICNX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 9.09% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 13.23% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 19.24% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 17.61% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 17.54% | -1.14% |