PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYU.L achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than ERNU.L's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYU.L has outperformed ERNU.L with an annualized return of 4.84%, while ERNU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.51% annualized return.


SHYU.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-2.17%
1Y
1.89%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.84%

ERNU.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.67%
YTD
1.86%
6M
1.08%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
2.46%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
3.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-1.70%-4.17%8.56%4.72%2.04%4.96%1.60%9.12%4.39%-3.89%
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.86%-2.45%7.39%-0.34%13.45%1.52%-2.17%-0.16%7.99%-7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYU.L and ERNU.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013

0.74

The correlation between SHYU.L and ERNU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYU.L
SHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYU.LERNU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.15

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

1.21

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

3.09

-2.66

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYU.L and ERNU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYU.LERNU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.83

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.58

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.38

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.42

+0.17

Drawdowns

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYU.L drawdown since its inception was -15.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ERNU.L drawdown of -14.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYU.L and ERNU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYU.LERNU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.01%

-14.92%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-4.43%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-9.54%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.08%

-14.92%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.01%

-14.92%

-0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.14%

-4.01%

-5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-5.80%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

1.74%

+2.09%

Volatility

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) is 1.72%, while iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that SHYU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYU.LERNU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

2.03%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

4.72%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

6.46%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

8.36%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.74%

9.34%

+0.40%

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNU.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYU.L vs. ERNU.L - Dividend Comparison

SHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERNU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
5.69%4.68%5.45%5.00%1.55%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%6.32%5.76%4.82%4.27%5.16%5.58%5.52%5.74%5.16%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYU.L and ERNU.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYU.L.

SHYU.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index, while ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYU.L and 0.09% for ERNU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYU.L and ERNU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer