PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.91%-2.45%7.39%-0.34%13.45%1.52%-4.62%
XT01.DE
Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C
2.50%-2.48%6.39%-0.58%12.98%0.78%-4.37%
Different Trading Currencies

ERNU.L is traded in GBP, while XT01.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XT01.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNU.L achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than XT01.DE's 2.50% return.


ERNU.L

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.91%
6M
3.07%
1Y
1.21%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
3.33%

XT01.DE

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.28%
YTD
2.50%
6M
3.47%
1Y
1.46%
3Y*
2.29%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XT01.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XT01.DE
XT01.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XT01.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT01.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT01.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XT01.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT01.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERNU.LXT01.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

0.20

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.30

0.34

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.04

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.30

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.47

0.56

-0.09

ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is comparable to the XT01.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNU.L and XT01.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERNU.LXT01.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.20

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.48

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.30

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between ERNU.L and XT01.DE is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE - Dividend Comparison

ERNU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, while XT01.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
5.69%4.68%5.45%5.00%1.55%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%
XT01.DE
Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.92%, roughly equal to the maximum XT01.DE drawdown of -15.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNU.L and XT01.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNU.LXT01.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-11.68%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-7.01%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.92%

-11.68%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-7.56%

+3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-4.80%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

4.28%

-1.10%

Volatility

ERNU.L vs. XT01.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) have volatilities of 2.08% and 2.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ERNU.LXT01.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

2.09%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

4.43%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.74%

7.14%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.34%

8.44%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.36%

8.40%

+0.96%