SHYTX vs. FQTHX
SHYTX (DWS Strategic High Yield Tax) and FQTHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 5 years, SHYTX returned 0.19%/yr vs 2.56%/yr for FQTHX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHYTX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQTHX.
Performance
SHYTX vs. FQTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHYTX achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than FQTHX's 3.32% return.
SHYTX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
FQTHX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 3.93%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SHYTX vs. FQTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHYTX DWS Strategic High Yield Tax | 2.18% | 4.05% | 5.47% | 7.64% | -17.22% | 5.44% | 5.04% | 3.81% |
FQTHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H | 3.32% | 5.94% | 8.76% | 8.88% | -14.00% | 6.04% | 4.90% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHYTX and FQTHX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SHYTX and FQTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHYTX vs. FQTHX — Risk / Return Rank
SHYTX
FQTHX
SHYTX vs. FQTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Strategic High Yield Tax (SHYTX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHYTX | FQTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.63 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.91 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 10.11 | -2.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHYTX vs. FQTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHYTX drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, which is greater than FQTHX's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYTX and FQTHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHYTX | FQTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -18.96% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -3.30% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.70% | -7.78% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.59% | -18.96% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | 0.00% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -4.68% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.95% | +0.04% |
Volatility
SHYTX vs. FQTHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Strategic High Yield Tax (SHYTX) is 0.83%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that SHYTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHYTX | FQTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 1.01% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | 2.76% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 3.75% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 5.36% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 6.06% | -1.04% |
SHYTX vs. FQTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHYTX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTHX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHYTX vs. FQTHX - Dividend Comparison
SHYTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than FQTHX's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQTHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H | 5.05% | 6.76% | 5.86% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.03% | 3.05% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHYTX DWS Strategic High Yield Tax | 4.27% | 5.59% | 4.01% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 2.88% | 4.44% | 4.87% | 4.35% | 3.49% | 4.29% | 4.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHYTX and FQTHX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FQTHX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to SHYTX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYTX dropped -27.17% vs FQTHX's -18.96%.
FQTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHYTX and FQTHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer